ProdMatch
CompaniesCitiesRolesSign in

Companies

  • Google
  • Microsoft
  • Meta
  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Atlassian
  • Nvidia
  • Oracle
  • See all 51 →

Cities

  • Bengaluru jobs
  • Hyderabad jobs
  • Pune jobs
  • Gurugram jobs
  • Noida jobs
  • Delhi NCR jobs
  • Mumbai jobs
  • Chennai jobs
  • Remote-India jobs

Roles

  • QA / SDET Engineers
  • Backend Engineers
  • Frontend Engineers
  • Full-stack Engineers
  • Data Analysts
  • Data Engineers
  • ML / AI Engineers
  • DevOps / SRE Engineers
  • All roles →

ProdMatch

  • About
  • Career guides
  • Compare
  • Salaries
  • Skills
  • DSA practice
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Sign in

© 2026 ProdMatch.ai · Built for India · DPDP Act 2023 compliant · Job data sourced from official company career pages.

Back to DSA
Graphsmedium45 minSecurity Engineer

Patch Evidence Path Finder

Security Engineer signal: shortest path + weighted graph in a patch priority queue context. This is a ProdMatch-owned security engineer drill, framed as a March 2026 ShareChat Vulnerability Management simulation, not a copied platform question.

Company context

ShareChat · Vulnerability Management

Freshness

March 2026

Product surface

patch priority queue

ProdMatch interview simulation based on product-team patterns; not a claim of a real company question.

Question

In patch priority queue, entities are connected by weighted evidence edges. For each query, find the least-cost evidence path from source to target while avoiding blocked entities.

Input

  • Weighted graph, blocked set, and q source-target queries.

Output

  • Minimum cost per query, or -1 if unreachable.

Constraints

  • 1 <= nodes <= 100000
  • 1 <= edges <= 300000
  • 1 <= queries <= 100000
  • All weights are non-negative.

Concepts

  • attack graphs
  • policy tries
  • anomaly detection
  • shortest path
  • weighted graph
  • retrieval quality

0-1 cost 2, 1-2 cost 3, query 0->2 -> 5

Approach

Try framing your own approach first. The 30 seconds you think before peeking is where learning happens.

Clean Solution

Reveal the approach first.

How well did you understand?

Your rating tunes when this problem shows up again.

Common Mistakes

  • Mark visited when enqueueing, not after repeated dequeue.
  • Do not ignore disconnected components if the product surface can have them.

Next Similar Problems

Attack Dependency DAG RecoverymediumAttack Evidence Path FinderhardPolicy Dependency DAG Recoveryhard